Skip to main content
HR 184 119th Congress House Public Lands and Natural Resources Environmental assessment, monitoring, research Forests, forestry, trees Wildlife conservation and habitat protection

Action Versus No Action Act

Introduced: January 3, 2025 Introduced by: McClintock, Tom Republican · California See on congress.gov
Sign in to write a letter Sign in to watch
 Everywhere this bill has been 5 steps
Introduced
In committee
Reported out
Passed House
Passed Senate
To President
Became law
May 21, 2026
Subcommittee Hearings Held
May 12, 2026
Referred to the Subcommittee on Federal Lands.
Feb 7, 2025
Referred to the Subcommittee on Forestry and Horticulture.
Jan 3, 2025
Referred to the Committee on Natural Resources, and in addition to the Committee on Agriculture, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Jan 3, 2025
Introduced in House
 Plain-English summary Congressional Research Service

Action Versus No Action Act

This bill limits the scope of an environmental assessment (EA) or environmental impact statement (EIS) conducted under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 for forest management activity on certain public lands to only the following two alternatives: (1) the effects of the forest management activity, and (2) no action.

The bill applies to any EA or EIS prepared by the Forest Service or the Department of the Interior for a forest management activity on public land that is suitable for timber production and that

  • occurs on land designated as an insect and disease treatment area under the Healthy Forests Restoration Act of 2003,
  • is developed through a collaborative process,
  • is proposed by a resource advisory committee, or
  • is covered by a community wildfire protection plan.

In the case of the alternative of no action, the Forest Service or Interior must consider whether to evaluate

  • the effect of no action on forest health, potential losses of life and property, habitat diversity, wildfire potential, insect and disease potential, and timber production; and
  • the implications of a resulting decline in forest health, loss of habitat diversity, wildfire, or insect or disease infestation on potential losses of life and property, domestic water supply in the project area, wildlife habitat loss, and other economic and social factors.
What's happening now May 21, 2026

Subcommittee Hearings Held